tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20548156294930734112024-03-05T11:11:01.506-05:00Coyote Commission Project BlogKyle Ancowitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03434218117646333666noreply@blogger.comBlogger46125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-498882501558956362012-08-20T10:02:00.000-04:002012-08-20T10:02:41.003-04:00It's Not Your Mother, It's a Man, Baby!<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I just wrapped up a draft of a television pilot script I’ve
been developing (read: “in own mind”) for the last few months. Without giving
too much away, it takes place in the mid-1970s and deals with professional sports.
Great soil for a show: drugs, race, money… great drama. Only one problem: no
women.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The way the story developed – and it developed as a strong,
multi-character ensemble – I became keenly aware that one of the drawbacks of
trying to be authentic in portraying a boy’s world in what was more of a boy’s
era than today is the difficulty of finding a place for strong female
characters, especially in a pilot where so much focus is just setting up the
world – where so much could be developed down the line in that world.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Now, let’s be clear. I have no interest in creating a show
driven entirely by male characters. But, in portraying a world that – at least
at first gloss – is driven entirely by male characters, I still want the world
I create to be authentic. There were plenty of female characters in the first
draft of this pilot and I could see many of them <i>developing</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> into strong characters. The problem is that, in a
pilot, the suggestion of development has to be there, sure, but there also has
to be something already there (since a pilot is generally only ever going to be
just a pilot, not a series).</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Take <i>Mad Men</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> and its
pilot. It also takes place in a different era, in a more male-centric arena,
but it’s been able to introduce many fantastic, strong female roles. But what
do we get in the pilot? We don’t get Betty yet. We don’t see Don’s home life
until the very last scene. We get Joan and Peggy, so there is the hint that
they will show us this world from a female perspective – from the savvy, sexy
veteran of the gender game and the shy, homlier newbie. Structurally, these
characters serve the pilot extremely well, but I’m putting a lot of weight back
onto those characters, I think, because of how they end up developing and
serving the show. I don’t know if there’s anything beyond a suggestion of that
in the pilot and I might only be reading that suggestion in because I know how
that it pans out. I think, if the pilot were a one-off, they could easily be
seen in the “women in traditional roles” characters, secretaries in a
male-driven world.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ugh…</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But here’s where Matthew Weiner made a very smart play.
Along with the cigarette account storyline (men dealing with men), he
introduces Rachel Menken, the daughter of a long-time department store owner,
who wants Sterling-Cooper to modernize their image. She’s an immediate foil and
love/sex interest for Don Draper and she seems perfectly authentic –
progressive, but believable for 1960. She’s smart enough to not immediately
succumb to Don Draper, which frustrates our protagonist, and becomes the
resonant suggestion that this show will find room for strong female characters.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So, I looked back at my story. It works (I think). It works
fine the way it is. But if I want to portray a world that’s representative of
the depth of complexity that is the core of every person, then I’m going to
have to tweak my representation of this world. The strongest choice that didn’t
involve blowing up the script and redeveloping it with this in mind (which,
most likely, would not lead to the greatest end product) was to change the
owner of the sports team from a man to a woman. This forced a lot of things in
a lot of scenes to change, but it also worked in the same way that Rachel
Menken worked in the <i>Mad Men </i><span style="font-style: normal;">pilot.
Marge Schott bought a minority ownership stake in the Cincinnati Reds in 1981,
not so far away from the mid-70s of this story. It would be a little
progressive for this era, but not so much that it would create a big
believability disconnect. In fact, it would likely produce more interesting
relationships than keeping the owner a man.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Now, I’m not breaking any big news by announcing that there
are places for strong female roles in traditionally male-centric worlds – and
I’m not trying to. But sometimes the tension (or even the perceived tension)
between authenticity and painting using the whole human pallet can be a
challenge. This was just my way in on this one particular project. And there
are plenty of other ways in.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There
are just... ways in.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
With a full human pallet, I will proceed to paint some happy
little trees.<br /><br />- Robert Attenweiler</div>
Robert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-66268302856910991802012-08-08T09:57:00.000-04:002012-08-20T10:01:58.872-04:00That Weird Sense of Clarity<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
The great
Japanese novelist Haruki Murakami never intended to be a writer. When he
graduated from college, he took out a loan and started a jazz club. The club
was a great success. He ran it for 10 years.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
One night he was at a baseball game. An American player
named Dave Hilton was up to bat. Hilton hit a ball deep into the outfield (it
would end up being a double). As the ball sailed through the air, a thought,
clear and unadorned, came into Murakami’s head – “I’m going to write a novel.”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
He did, a novella called <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Hear
the Wind Sing. </i>It won a prestigious writer’s prize. His second novel was
also a success, so he sold his jazz club in order to write full time. More than
a dozen books later, with sales in the millions, translated into dozens of languages,
Murakami is regularly mentioned as a candidate for the Nobel Prize. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">A</b> few weeks ago a
somewhat lesser writer (me) was sitting at his writing desk in the basement.
Sunlight was pouring in through the small window. My son was napping. I had two
unclaimed hours ahead of me. It was time to start work on a new version of the
play I’m writing for the Blue Coyote Commission Project. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Some ideas had been swimming around for a while, but thusfar
I’d been unable to start the actual writing. That day appeared to be no
different. I sat there, staring at the screen. I thought of a few things I
could write, but nothing felt compelling.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I picked up my book and started to read. I always have a
book with me when I write. Reading relaxes me, and lets me stay focused on
words without having to focus the words I actually have to write. Barry Bonds
said hitting is all about relaxed concentration, and that’s the place I try to
find when writing.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As I was reading, I started to think about a story a friend
had told me the day before. The subject of the story was so directly applicable
to the subject of my Blue Coyote play that I knew I would use it in some way.
What I didn’t know was how I would integrate it into the other things I wanted
to write.Just to get myself going, I started to write a new scene, completely
spontaneously, based loosely on that story. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
That’s when it started. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As soon as I began writing, these “characters” started
talking to each other. I put “characters” in quotes because I had no idea who
these people were. They didn’t have names. They did, however, have a
relationship, though not one I had given any conscious thought to. The rhythms
of their speech, their in-jokes and points of contention, came out
effortlessly. It was like I was taking dictation.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Then something even more extraordinary happened. As I was
taking down what these people said to each other, vistas rolled out in front of
me. I could see it all with crystalline clarity. Everything I wanted to talk
about in this play fit effortlessly into this scene I had begun to write. This
wasn’t a scene in my new play. It was<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> </i>my
new play.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
To give some background - I have spent <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">months </i>trying to write this play. I wrote fifty pages that were read
publically and was deeply disappointed by the result. I decided to quit the
commission, slowly came back to the idea of writing a new play, procrastinated
for more months, and then, all of a sudden, here it was. A two-person play, in
real time, on a single late night in an apartment in Queens. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I’ve never written a two person play. I’ve never written a
play that takes place in real time (a full-length, anyway). It didn’t matter.
This is the play that presented itself. This is the play I have to write.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I suppose that would be called a “Eureka!” moment, but I
didn’t feel like shouting. It was much more mundane, though no less pleasurable
for its simplicity. It was more like a, “Huh. Ok. I guess I’ll do that” moment.
It wasn’t dramatic, but it was as clear as anything I’ve ever felt.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I can’t know for sure, but I suspect that’s what Murakami
felt that day at the baseball stadium. Not a lightning bolt. No need to shout. Just clarity.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
“Huh. Ok. I guess I’ll do that”.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Grace doesn’t always feel like we think it will.<br /><br />- John Yearley</div>
Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-26671462418690996402012-06-07T14:12:00.005-04:002012-06-07T14:12:57.839-04:00Who Wrote This?Every writer can tell a version of this story:<br />
<br />
For one reason or another, you
are called upon to look at some of your old work. As you go through it, a
disquieting feeling arises. Lines are unfamiliar. You look at passages and can
no longer remember writing them. The decisions that went into each and every
word, decisions that lived in the forefront of your consciousness for months,
or even years, are gone like vapor. There is a foreign quality to the whole
project. You find yourself asking questions: What was the impetus for this
scene? Where did these characters come from? In the end, it all crystalizes
into a single, almost existential query:<br />
<br />Who wrote this?<br />
<br />You wrote it. You know that.
And yet…it’s different now. The work exists apart from you. Maybe it would be
more to the point to say that, now, it simply exists. It is no longer <i>a-thing-becoming</i>. It is a thing.<br />
<br />It is usually impossible to know
when this transition happens for me, but not this time. I can’t pinpoint the
exact moment, but I know I finished a draft of my latest play, <i>Another Girl</i>, on August 2<sup>nd</sup>,
2011. On May 27<sup>th</sup>, 2012 I went back to look at a scene. Somewhere in
those 290 days, <i>Another Girl </i>had gone
from being “my play” to being “a play that I happen to have written.”<br />
<br />The transition, however
organic, comes with difficulties. The reason I went back to look at my play had
to do with a conversation my agent had with a theatre’s Artistic Director. This
AD really liked <i>Another Girl, </i>but was
taken aback by the language in a particular scene. I don’t usually concern
myself too much with problems like that (my work isn’t for everyone, not every
theatre is right for my work), but several people I respect had spoken very highly
of this woman. She has programmed adventurous work in the past. It was also the
third time I had heard a complaint about this scene. I started to wonder -
maybe I had missed something. I don’t mind shocking people, but I don’t want
shock to be an end in itself. At the very least, it seemed to be worth my while
to take a look.<br />
<br />My first response was horror.
Not at the scene, but at the unfamiliarity of the whole piece, described above.
Once I became acclimated, I started to see the play with new eyes. This is both
good and bad. It is good to have perspective, but you don’t want to do too much
when you are cut off from the inspiration that drove you to write in the first
place. The scene in question, though, was a short one. I found I didn’t need to
fully re-immerse myself in the world of the play to look at it critically.<br />
<br />It looked different to me. Part
of it was probably the criticism I had heard, but I didn’t feel defensive. I don’t
have a problem disregarding unhelpful
notes, but I didn’t feel like disregarding this. I still liked the scene as it
was, but also saw the criticism was not without merit. I saw that the criticism
wasn’t caused by prudishness, or at least that wasn’t the only cause. Looked at
in a different light, I saw that the pathos of the scene might be compromised
by the extremity of some of the language.<br />
<br />So I wrote a different version.
I was actually surprised by how little I had to change. The arc of the scene,
the humor of it, was fundamentally the same. It might even be better now.
<br />
<br />
I’m not sure yet. I want to
live with the change awhile before deciding if I want to keep it. But it has
been an adventure. You never know what’s going to come up when you go back to
look at old work.<br />
<br />
- John YearleyJohnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-11665922413169783452012-05-25T11:19:00.000-04:002012-05-25T11:19:12.888-04:00#TheArtOfTheHashTagI don’t know if you do the Twitter. I assume you do – or some of you, at least – many of you. It can be fun. I can see what my favorite professional athletes say to people who aren’t me, most of whom I don’t know. Friends, probably. Business partners. Maybe. They say things like “@notgorevidal Totally… totally. See you around. #RockinDowntown”
That’s some good stuff right there. And not just the part where we get to know that this guy – we’ll call him pro ball player @RealDarnellValentine (20 bucks to the first person who can tell me who the real Darnell Valentine is … which is to say who Darnell Valentine is) – believes something tweeted at him by his buddy @notgorevidal (who I’m pretty sure is, in fact, not Gore Vidal) in its totality and that they plan to see each other soon or, barring that, at least @RealDarnellValentine is the type of guy who is open to seeing this friend or acquaintance again, even if circumstances never allow that meeting to occur. @RealDarnellValentine believes in pleasantries, as many of us do. So, besides clearly laying our psychologies bare for the entire internet to see (as our tweets will get retweeted and retweeted, ad infinitum ... clearly), we are left with that spec of real invention when it comes to writing for the Twitter. It’s not the 140-character count. That tends to lead to awkward syntax and words spelled with numbers and not enough space to include all those ellipses … I love to … put into … my writing. No, the real chance for writing invention in this forum is that blurred-together phrase following what I always called the “number sign.” Ladies and Gentlemen, the hashtag. Recently, I took on a freelance job that required me writing quite a bit of copy that blah, blah, blah, blah … (fast forward) … and the company (which shall remain nameless) is obsessed with clever hashtags as part of this copy. My brain now annoyingly creates hashtags for things I see while I’m waiting for the subway, having a conversation or, recently (and most unfortunately), while sleeping. The idea of the hashtag is simple. When I tweet something about, say, a new restaurant I just ate at and I follow it with a hashtag, say, #NewRestaurantsNYC, and other people do the same thing, all the tweets and the people tweeting about those things can be found and connected and so forth (I never said I was good at explaining this stuff…). So, you have an AP (actual purpose) hashtag. Then you have FBIART (funny because it’s all run together) and I think a good FBIART is an honest-to-god literary accomplishment. They’re the epigrams of the modern world. They contextualize the tweet and rely on a flexibility and play with language to really stand out. It's the hashtag, not however many characters come before it, that can be something new, if only because of the bizarre rules that define it. Right now, two of the top trending hashtags on Twitter are #schoolmemories (snooooore … I’d have gone with #RememberMeAsIWas … ah, still not even that great) and #YouGettinPunchedIf which, while a little obvious, has its possibilities. Remember, most hashtags are as unexceptional as most things. But some, just like with some of most things, can be freakin’ exciting as hell.
(clears throat)
So … um … in conclusion… words can still be fun? Sure. I’ll take that as the lesson.
FBIART. Excuse me...<br />
<br />- Robert AttenweilerRobert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-65402846305184393112012-05-08T09:09:00.002-04:002012-05-08T09:09:52.718-04:00On "Death of a Salesman"<div class="MsoNormal">
I once heard a talk by the Artistic Director of one of the
country’s largest and most respected children’s theatres. One of the great
benefits of writing for kids, he said, was the response of the audience. “For
children,” he said, “theatre is not an aesthetic experience. It’s just an <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">experience</i>.” </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Those words came to mind after I saw the Broadway revival of
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Death of a Salesman</i> last month.
However great most theatrical experiences are – thrilling or funny or
heartbreaking – they usually are, for me, aesthetic experiences. I have an
amazing time, leave the theatre elated, and relish it for days afterward. This
production of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Death of a Salesman</i>,
however, felt qualitatively different. It wasn’t like I’d seen something. It
was like something had happened to me.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
It’s a difficult phenomenon to explain. I think I have
failed, for the most part, when describing it to my friends. I attempt to relay
the depth of the experience through anecdote, mentioning the two times I had to
make a conscious effort to pull myself together so as to not completely dissolve
in tears. I don’t think what I say has much impact. Superlatives are thrown
around so casually these days (“AMAZING!” “INCREDIBLE! “BRILLIANT!” “GENIUS!” ) it is nearly impossible
to cut through the fog when something truly singular comes along. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The closest I can get, I suppose, is to simply relate what I
felt like leaving the play. It was late on St. Patrick’s Day, my least favorite
day of the year in New York City. As I walked from the theater to Penn Station
with my wife and my mother, we dodged pools of vomit, loutish men screeching at
cowering women, and every other variety of misery that alcohol can inflict on
humanity. We barely said a word. There was a kind of shocked silence between us.
It’s what happens when experience exceeds the ability to describe it.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The source of the production’s greatness is manifold, but I
think top kudos go to Mike Nichols. Until I saw this, I had been of the thought
that Nichols has been trading on past glory for years. While his accomplishments
are unassailable (<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Graduate</i>, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf</i>), the
number of completely anonymous projects he has put his name on in the last 20
years (<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Closer</i>, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Wolf</i>, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Regarding Henry</i>) is
legion. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Let me take this opportunity to remove my foot from my mouth
and officially withdraw any statements I may have made questioning Mr. Nichols’
talent. I don’t pretend to know what he did to achieve what he achieved in this
production of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Salesman</i>, but he
somehow got the naked, bleeding, awful, compassionate heart of the play out on
to that stage. It’s an astonishing piece of work. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The actors are amazing as well. Linda Emond is, as always,
extraordinary. And Philip Seymour Hoffman is truly magnificent in the iconic
lead role. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I make no bones about my partisanship for Hoffman. I have
seen him onstage and onscreen, in large roles and small, in comedy and drama,
for almost 20 years. He is the best I have ever seen. But my particular
affection and admiration for him come not just from his virtuoso talent, or the
marvelous way he has managed his career. There is something incredibly <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">generous</i> about Philip Seymour Hoffman as
an actor. Some actors are amazing craftspeople, but they keep you at a slight, almost unnoticeable remove. Hoffman
is guileless. Seeing him play Willy is not watching a Great Actor play a Great
Role. Instead, you watch a hapless, somewhat dim man make mistake after mistake
and completely destroy his life. People offer him help but he cannot take it.
In the end all he really wants is his son’s love. When Willy says, just before
killing himself, “Biff likes me! Isn’t that a remarkable thing?” it is almost
too much to bear.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I won’t go on at any greater length for fear of becoming one
of those overpraisers I mentioned earlier. I will just say what should be the
only line of any review of this show – GO SEE IT. You can’t know what you’re
missing if you don’t.<br /><br />- John Yearley</div>Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-88667493305237488282012-04-27T15:35:00.000-04:002012-04-27T15:35:44.076-04:00Good Advice From The Guy Who Just Dumped YouI wanted to drop in a block quote from my recent reading - Christian Parker's article, <a href="http://www.howlround.com/the-art-of-the-breakup-by-christian-parker/" target="_blank">"The Art of the Breakup"</a> at <a href="http://howlround.com/" target="_blank">howlround.com</a>. The article, it seems to me, is a call for clearer communication between playwrights and the literary managers at institutional theaters. I recommend a full read, but these lines caught my attention:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"I am so tired of having lunches, drinks, and meetings with playwrights who cannot decipher the messages they are getting from theaters, and show me copies of endlessly nit-picky and detailed letters offering critical dramaturgical feedback from people they don’t know, and who, in most cases presumably don’t like their work enough to advance it. Playwrights need to solicit and accept feedback only from those people that they respect, trust, and rely on.</blockquote>
<br\>I know I've been a party to similar exchanges from the literary manager's side, although that isn't my title. I will confess that there were times when I declined to work on a play because we didn't have the resources to produce it, and I will allow that there were other instances when a lack of resources was a convenient excuse for declining a play I didn't really believe in. To console myself for causing a disappointment, I may have offered some suggestions. The cloud of confusion that Parker describes is generally the result.<br /><br />
</br\><br />
<br\>Parker wishes these professional disappointments could be like the best possible romantic disappointments: "Rejections," he writes, "as in 'real life,' should be gracious, clean, and quick. Of course, I don't remember any disappointments like that from my real life. What a delightful idea, though!<br /><br />
</br\><br />
<br\>Commission playwrights: do you have any stories to share about the mixed messages and unwanted advice you've received when shopping your plays?<br />
<br />- Kyle Ancowitz
</br\>Kyle Ancowitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03434218117646333666noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-59226585998103186842012-04-20T13:23:00.003-04:002012-04-20T13:23:51.255-04:00Magic/Bird and the Myth of the "New Theater Audience"I had the opportunity to see <a href="http://www.magicbirdbroadway.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-style: italic;">Magic/Bird</span> on Broadway</a> last week and I'm still shaking my head a little.<br />
<br />
I'm not even shaking my head at the show so much - which I like just a tiny bit more than I thought I would or knew I should (though I will be the first to admit that I am a sucker for much of what was enjoyable about the show, even as I recognize that "liking" something means very little to any project's artistic aspirations, had artistic aspirations rated highly enough to have even been given a schwag bag at this particular party).<br />
<br />
I'm not against popular entertainments. I'm a<span style="font-style: italic;"> sports </span>fan, for god's sake. And I'm not entirely against empty popular entertainments. I'm a <span style="font-style: italic;">Cleveland sports fan</span>, for god's sake. But there does seem to be some back-patting on the part of the show's producers about how they are attracting "non-traditional" fans to the theater. <br />
<br />
Now, I will admit that the crowd at the show I saw was <span style="font-weight: bold;">hands-down</span> the most diverse crowd I've ever seen at a play. But, those people who will go see <span style="font-style: italic;">Magic/Bird</span> will very likely not rush out to see <span style="font-style: italic;">Venus In Fur</span> the following weekend because - you know, that theater thing's got something interesting going on. <br />
<br />
These "new theater goers" then are little more than dollar signs invented by the producers. They have figured out a way to get people to the theater who wouldn't normally go - but they are not people who will likely go back - and the people who would normally go don't really see the point in this project so they won't go ... and it's a whole cycle that they hope can be sustained just long enough to justify itself.<br />
<br />
So, bravo to the producers of <span style="font-style: italic;">Magic/Bird</span> for figuring out a way to (possibly) make money. Good work. But let's call it that. Let's not call it theater. <br />
<br />
Theater as we know, is about figuring out a way to (probably) lose money.<br /><br />- Robert AttenweilerRobert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-43894178438014521852012-04-12T16:31:00.001-04:002012-04-12T16:31:30.818-04:00Draft 1 Done!<div class="MsoNormal">
Ok, so after weeks of procrastinating… after a week of sleeping in four hour stretches, where I woke up at 4am with ideas of scenes, woke up two hours later realizing said ideas for scenes were garbage…writing and writing then cutting cutting cutting...</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Last night I finally heard the first draft of my Blue Coyote commissioned play! Currently a full-length one act, still called HUNTERS AND THIEVES, the play was read by fellow writers at a weekly playwrights group I have been going to for well over a decade now (the Playwrights Unit at Ensemble Studio Theatre). We don’t use “real” actors, so the feel is very different than what it will be when BCTG finally has a reading of it, but incredibly useful. I both loved a lot of it… and heard and felt how much work there is ahead for this piece. It’s definitely a first draft. But I got totally jazzed hearing it. Good sign. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
And thus today I sent Draft 1 to Gary, my liaison with the BCTG team. Nervous/excited to hear BCTG’s feedback and dig into a rewrite/reimagining. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
In other news, last night I finally got a good night sleep.<br /><br />- David Zelnik</div>David Zellnikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01846940762193857903noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-57462851873863815282012-03-30T14:08:00.002-04:002012-03-30T14:09:46.447-04:00A Riff on the Play I'm Writing<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.desiostudios.com/sites/default/files/imagepicker/1/blogpost_26powercogeese.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://www.desiostudios.com/sites/default/files/imagepicker/1/blogpost_26powercogeese.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
My Coyote Commission play is a spring play. I know it's a spring play because spring is here and I can't stop thinking about it. Spring is a minefield - the smell of mud, the feel of air chilled by the water and warmed by the sun, the giddiness of forsythias - everything pulls me down the rabbit hole.<br />
<br />
My thoughts get jumbled and pile up. Things are difficult to sift through, they just accumulate in drifts. I don't want to let anything go and really all I want to do is to skip out before the bell rings, sneak to my car and drive off to the river with some bean burritos.<br />
<br />
But this isn't high school, I don't have a car anymore and taco bell makes me sick. <br />
<br />
My play is also a memory play. But I don't want anyone to know that. So don't tell anyone. <br />
<br />
At the moment my play is a pile of fits and starts. It's laying there under the mulch - sprouting some early blooms, but those don't last long. I'm waiting for the annuals. Waiting for the leaves that can last a season, sniffing out the roots to ground it all. <br />
<br />
Till then. I'm gathering all I can.Kristen Palmerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07614560879130581868noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-18645161336832920962012-03-23T15:41:00.007-04:002012-03-23T15:42:51.674-04:00TAKING THE SHOW ON THE ROAD<img alt="http://ourgreatestyear.com/" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5713856945703577986" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2pktv_n3yb0JJY1T-oXYxsjn83cpBt2lmNE75UTk0B-dY__dXr-npowJbR9izSSH7vJMgmRzSMGALikYi2XnFs1Fz64jGtrNOEghXEBn4iO8jQFefrzu8Z2SbTdVL3vzfhDC1zazp9a8/s200/OGY-Promo3.jpg" style="float: right; height: 138px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; width: 200px;" title="" /><br />
I’m back.<br />
<br />
I’m back in rehearsal.<br />
<br />
I’m never back in rehearsal.<br />
<br />
I’m always just in rehearsal (except when I’m not) for the next project that I’m going to speed along to the stage – the producer-version of the father at a shotgun wedding – carefully keeping the script between my two barrels…<br />
<br />
But, as of late last week, I’m back in rehearsal for my play “Our Greatest Year” (with <a href="http://scotthenkle.com/">S. Henkle</a>) about one couple’s relationship and the 2007 Cleveland professional sports year.<br />
<br />
I’m back because in late-March we’re taking the show, fittingly, to Cleveland for a limited run hosted by <a href="http://jcu.edu/">John Carroll University</a> at the fantastic <a href="http://dobama.org/">Dobama Theatre</a>.<br />
<br />
Woo-hoo, right? (not to be confused with Wahoo which is a troubling Cleveland thing in its own right…)<br />
<br />
I wrote this play in 3 weeks. We rehearsed it for 2 and put it up for 4 performances last June.<br />
<br />
Now, I’ve been living with it for nearly a year. We’ll have more rehearsal time than we did originally, as well as a comparable run.<br />
<br />
We’re back.<br />
<br />
My director, Anna Brenner, started the actors – and, consequently, me – by asking how their thoughts on the play, the characters, etc. had changed since our first foray.<br />
<br />
As a writer – and I’ll just speak for myself – you always think you can tear down the whole script – or not. <br />
<br />
So, I’m aware that the play’s got its flaws (…yeah, like if supreme awesomeness is a flaw…) but the nature of the play – it’s a blend of live stage action and projected motion comics – makes it a difficult revision (as the words can be changed and changed or not infinitely easier than the images).<br />
<br />
With the writing, we can nip and tuck and tweak and recontextualize, but we pretty much need to go to war with the ammo we got. Returning to the show is, then, more complicated for me as the producer. In four weeks I’m taking two writers, two actors and a director to a city where I haven’t lived in fifteen years, know relatively few people and have (relatively) no clue who the theater-going community is or how to reach them (relatively).<br />
<br />
So, I’m back in rehearsal thinking about audience. Not in the way that a writer thinks about an audience as the theoretical people who will be receiving this work, but the practical audience – the people who will be in the practical seats – my least favorite thing to think about when producing a show in NYC. I’m thinking about audience. Audience, audience, audience.<br />
<br />
And it’s actually kinda fun…<br />
<br />
In NY, I often have the feeling that I know every one of the 200-or-so people I have a fighting chance of getting to see my show. In fact, the fact that I know them is the primary reason I have a fighting chance to get them. That’s how independent stuff works here.<br />
<br />
Cleveland – and this may be the single most shocking statement I will ever write – has certain advantages over NY. It has family, friends and family friends, many of whom have never had the chance to see the work we’ve been doing out here. There are the 200-or-so JCU students who will be encouraged/required to attend. But, beyond that, the audience question is wide-open.<br />
<br />
There is no one <span style="font-style: italic;">yet</span> who has refused to attend. There is no marketing strategy (<span style="font-style: italic;">yet</span>) that has blown up in my face. There have <span style="font-style: italic;">yet</span> to be modestly attended shows or lukewarm receptions (clearly the fault of them and not us) or thousands and thousands of dollars thrown with gusto from the nearest open window… Not. Just. <span style="font-style: italic;">Yet</span>.<br />
<br />
So, I’m back in rehearsal feeling, I guess, what one hopes one feels when one is back: I’m excited and hopeful … however suspiciously. I love the show and the cast and think we have a fighter’s chance of performing this for actual people. Hopefully many of them. Now, if only Bernie Kosar would return my emails requesting his attendance…<br />
<br />
Hey – ho – way to go – Ohio.<br />
<br />
You can learn more about this production at <a href="http://ourgreatestyear.com/">www.OurGreatestYear.com</a>.<br />
<br />
- Robert AttenweilerRobert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-62215543081314563612012-03-19T08:46:00.000-04:002012-03-19T08:46:01.003-04:00Failure<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">“Failure”</b> is such a dirty word. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />People in the arts talk a lot about bravery, about having the courage to follow your impulse no matter where it leads. What this means, in practical terms, is that you have to give yourself the right to fail. You have to accept failure, make friends with it.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />Still, people don’t really talk much about failure. It’s considered rude, unsupportive.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />I failed recently. I failed as a part of the project for which I am writing now. I failed in my first attempt at my Blue Coyote commission. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />In December I brought 50 pages of a new play to be read for an invited group at the Dramatists Guild. We spent a very pleasant hour there hearing what I had written. There were good parts and bad, some laughs, some moving moments. When it was all over I heard many nice things, and soon after received many supportive emails and calls.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />But it was a failure. Make no mistake about it. I failed.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />No one said that to me, of course. I don’t think they were just being polite. I think they didn't say anything because the only person who could really know that I failed was me. Everyone who came to the reading saw the same mixed bag up there that I did, but only I knew the dispiriting truth – I had reached a dead end. <br /><br />Others could easily have seen this likable mishmash as a promising start. I knew that it was over.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />I kinda knew before the reading. I had been running out of gas for a while. I was hoping that something would happen in the reading to prove me wrong, or would appear that would show me the way I needed to go.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />It didn’t. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><br />What </b>is one to do in the face of failure? My first response was “Abandon ship!” I would call the Coyotes and tell them that I appreciated their support but my experiment was a failure and it was time to move on. I thought about that a lot in the first few weeks after the reading. The thought gave me great comfort. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />I never did make that call, though. I wonder why. Was it stubbornness? Gratitude to the Coyotes? A sneaking suspicion that there actually was a play in all that <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">mishegoss</i> if I could just see my way clear to finding it? </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />Silently, without ever acknowledging it, I accepted that I would try again. Once decided, I had an impulse to jump right in. Pop open the hood and get to work. Fix everything! Save what I liked and toss the rest!</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />I didn’t do that. Some other impulse, a deeper impulse, told me that anything I tried to do right away would be Band Aids on a hemorrhage. So I suppressed that impulse. Instead I did…nothing. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />Actually, that’s not true. I did do something. I thought. I daydreamed. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />The first thing to appear was a monologue. Then a new opening scene. Then an idea for a closing scene. Then a new twist on one of the original characters that would make her much more interesting. And before I knew it, my brain was firing again.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />Since then, the ideas have flowed freely. I have ideas for new scenes involving libertarians, ventriloquists, and sodomy (have I stumbled on a new title?). I don’t know if any of them will work, but we’re about to find out.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />I cannot promise success. I haven’t the faintest idea if any of it will work. But what I have now is the one thing I absolutely cannot write without.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />I’m a little excited.<br /><br />- John Yearley</div>Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-1586340524720471232012-02-28T14:56:00.000-05:002012-02-28T14:56:25.526-05:00Severe Clarity!<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /> “If criticism is meant to speak to the
successful clarity of what was INTENDED, as Mr. Adamo suggests, what is the
helpful way to speak of a work in process that is still brewing, still deciding
what it is supposed to be?” - <a href="http://coyotecommissionprojectblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/constructive-criticism.html" target="_blank">Stephen Speights</a></span></blockquote>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">The
topic of constructive criticism is an excellent one. I love Stephen’s post and the question
he poses in it. I’m also completely
blown away by the phrase ‘severe clarity’ as a way to describe the aim of an
artist. I’ve never heard that before,
but am now adding it to my bag of references as a reminder of what I’m after
when things seem lost. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Readings
are an invaluable part of the writing process for me, as they probably
are for every playwright. I had two in
January for plays that are in two very different places. One is finished and has had a production
already, the other is the piece I’m working on for Blue Coyote, which is in the
early, fifty-pages stage. The two projects feed into each
other plotwise, so it’s good fortune to
have to work on them at the same time. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">The
first play is in pretty good shape - it is a total and complete play. A director and I are working on it together
and the informal reading marked the real beginning of our collaborative
process. Going in, there was a section that
didn’t feel quite right to me during the play’s production in 2011, and I knew
I wanted to look at it during this reading.
The director had his questions too as this was the first time he was
hearing it out loud. We were lucky to
have wonderful actors, some rehearsal and a great audience. All in all, questions were answered and the
director came away with some notes, four to be precise. They took me forever to understand, but in
the end were insightful and spot on. I
can… now hold on to your hats people… I can be very defensive when receiving
notes. It’s definitely much better than
it was, but I tend to have a terrible “oh no” feeling right before, like
perhaps it’s going to be a big battle or I’m really going to disagree or be
upset. I’ve had to learn how to really
listen through my nerves and consistently seek to understand what’s being said
to me. In this particular case, I can
see in hindsight (after reading Stephen’s post) that what the director was
aiming for in his notes, and why I appreciated them so much, was to aid towards that ‘severe clarity’ of what’s intended.
His notes were constructive.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">The
second piece for the CCP is not a play yet.
The reading I had for it had no audience – just the actors and
myself. It was the first time it was
going to be heard at all, which I find to be a very tender time. At the earliest stages, such readings are for
my ears only and not open to criticism.
It’s just a baby, after all.
Plus, my main question going in to these first-read-of-pages things is -
does this suck or not? Not suck to
anyone else, but to me? After getting over
that hurdle, I can ask the great, smart actors who graciously read for me
questions about this or that, if they got certain elements, do they want to
know what happens, etc. It offers me
incredible clarity on what’s next, what works and doesn’t, a general sense of
the gathering storm of a complete play. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">When
I began writing the finished play mentioned earlier, I would attend a weekly
actors group that invited writers to bring pages in they wanted heard. I had done this for the first play I’d
written and found it helpful, so it made sense to do the same with this
one. But the voice, the intention for
that first play was very loud and strong right off the bat, so even though it
was difficult to hear comments (I was just learning!), I could take them or
leave them. But the second play was
different. It didn’t start as sure as
the first and it had an unconventional structure. As a result, the un-moderated comments, hard
to take to begin with, were not at all constructive. They tended to be in the vein of what should
be instead of what was, an ‘it’s not going to work if you do it this way’ type
of thing. And I remember reacting very,
very badly. Everyone involved meant
well, but it became clear that if I was going to listen to my own voice in
writing the play, there could be no outside voices for a time. Not until it had a real shape, a real, solid
intention. So I stopped going to the
class and asked actors to read for me when the need to hear it came. And that play has ended up doing well for
itself - I’m proud of it. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNoSpacing">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">So, if
it’s still brewing, if I still don’t know quite what it is, there is no
criticism that will be constructive. It just
ends up offending me, which is ridiculous.
Therefore I’ve found it best not to open up that part of the
process. There are a few trusted people
who look at pages early on, but that’s it.
For me, criticism is only actually constructive once what is intended is
firmly set. Then it’s vital.<br /><br />- Christine Whitley<o:p></o:p></span></div>Christine Whitleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00753800284050836904noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-16507706864677262402012-02-21T15:56:00.000-05:002012-02-21T15:58:26.079-05:00ENDINGSBeginnings are hard. Middles are hard. But endings are hard.<br />
<br />
When something is good, a book, a play, anything, my usual thought, my subconscious drumbeat, is “please stay good, please stay good." There are just so many ways to start well, and – in my estimation – only one way good to finish:
The ending should feel both unexpected and inevitable.<br />
<br />
That is, I want to feel a gasp or surprise and pleasure...but when I look back over the play I should, for a moment, believe it couldn’t have ended any other way. It should fulfill some promise that has been made to me, but in a way I wouldn’t have thought of myself.
All of which is to say, I don’t know how to end my play.<br />
<br />
Cause again, they can feel like verdicts: so <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">this</i> is what actually happened. <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">This</i> is the author’s point of view on the characters, the ideas. If an ending is too pat, the play wafts away. But if it feels too opaque, it leaves me grumbly and cranky and unsatisfied.<br />
<br />
There are some canonical plays that I would offer disappoint deeply at the end and everyone knows it (I’ll offer my nominations over drinks if you like). And there are plays that muddle along until the last 10 minutes, and only then become thrilling and thus become hits (again, ask me over booze). <br />
<br />
But back to me and HUNTERS AND THIEVES. Like all plays in progress, I suppose I’ll just have to write and write and write different versions of the ending. Read one by reading the whole draft, then read the whole draft with a different version. Curl up in ball and throw all the pages out. Wait for a deadline and write another version. Do it badly. Rewrite. Hope that one day I have a shock of understanding and do it right.
<br />
<br />
- David ZellnikDavid Zellnikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01846940762193857903noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-67837202809584921892012-02-13T12:44:00.000-05:002012-02-13T12:44:19.905-05:00Learning to Fall in Love (with yourself) Again...<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtveZaeUwbTev3VmvTaeF3l9CBEMV52uhtyqAP3CBYPTarjn9JShVK91fqnQz4wRi7QemeJQ7e7meg2K4H8JQBwJ9GfORNWbIvxKvPuO7fv9TlZQemq0LeeAynvPiu2OrazHgzTsUxSio/s1600/narcissus.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5705384881628611970" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtveZaeUwbTev3VmvTaeF3l9CBEMV52uhtyqAP3CBYPTarjn9JShVK91fqnQz4wRi7QemeJQ7e7meg2K4H8JQBwJ9GfORNWbIvxKvPuO7fv9TlZQemq0LeeAynvPiu2OrazHgzTsUxSio/s200/narcissus.jpg" style="display: block; height: 200px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 165px;" /></a><br />
<br />
I'm in the process of preparing a four-year old script for publication.<br />
<br />
The New York Theater Experience's <a href="http://indietheaternow.com/">IndieTheaterNow</a> is publishing highlights of the FRIGID New York Festival's 5-year run to celebrate that anniversary and my 2007 play <i>The Butterfield Tones</i> is among those lights.<br />
<br />
But how am I supposed to feel about this thing that I wrote five years ago and haven't touched since?<br />
<br />
Should I find it precious? Antiquated? Dated? Beneath my current mastery of the dramatic arts? Should I be jealous of it? Should I hate it?<br />
<br />
We've probably all felt some version of these things about old things that we've written and, probably, the conventional wisdom holds that I should feel something between the love and the hate ends of the spectrum. It's wrong to really like something that far behind me, isn't it?<br />
<br />
But I really like this play.<br />
<br />
It's not perfect, by any stretch. It's short. And it's, ultimately, an experiment. But it does some fun theatrical things that I haven't done since and reminds me of a time when, in many respects, I took myself less seriously. It's play is, perhaps, what I still like so much about it.<br />
<br />
But what does this say about my going forward as a writer?<br />
<br />
Well, the short answer is "everything is fine." It would really suck to look back on previous projects and think them amateurish and terrible, to not see what made me excited to be working on them when that's what I was working on.<br />
<br />
And, I guess, that's the point. If I can still get the sniffles from the bug whose infestation led to Project X then I'm still in that same arena ... it's just now a more crowded arena filled now with more varied projects, more kinds of writing - but all things that are authentic to me.<br />
<br />
Every word I put down is not precious - it is not gold (despite, very much, those exact claims in this blog) - but maintaining the general writing head-space from project-that-excites-me to project-that-excites-me is, I think, what, at the end of the day, will be the measure of that work to me.<br />
<br />
Oh, and it's okay to like the work you've done, no matter how far removed. Go ahead and think that poem you wrote in the 4th grade contains some truly unique imagery. Secretly think that the short story you wrote in college has some of the better sentences written in the last-half of the 20th Century. Laugh at your own jokes. <br />
<br />
Better that option than the other...<br />
<br />
- Robert AttenweilerRobert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-74686026620304475082012-02-10T16:02:00.001-05:002012-02-10T16:05:35.787-05:00Constructive CriticismI was in the audience at two different work-in-progress presentations these past weeks. I’ll start with the second experience, as it helped me to pinpoint my feelings on the first.<br />
<br />
THE ART OF THE ARIA was a master class led by the composer/librettist Mark Adamo. Working with a small group of hand-picked writers and musicians (friend and collaborator David Johnston among them), Mr. Adamo invited us to sit in as he, along with his students, critiqued the arias created for the class.<br />
<br />
Mr. Adamo started with rules-of-the-road regarding their evaluating comments. I’m paraphrasing from memory, but what struck me most went something like this:<br />
<br />
<ol>
<li>Avoid using the phrase “I LIKED THIS”. Avoid “THAT DIDN’T WORK.” Something is SUCCESSFUL when something INTENDED OCCURS, and occurs with clarity. </li>
<li>In your critique, speak descriptively about what you SAW and HEARD, then let that lead to comments of what you experienced. Let your opinion about the work/scene/moment follow from how successfully the work expressed what was INTENDED. </li>
<li>The goal of the artist is SEVERE CLARITY. And the work should limit, rather than expand, the possibilities of its presentation. As the artist you guide us to what you want it to be.</li>
</ol>
<br />
These guidelines were revelatory to me, and made me wish I could have bent space and time to switch Mr. Adamo’s class with the invited staged reading I had attended a couple of weeks prior: John Yearley’s first fifty pages or so of CLEAR HISTORY, the script he is working on as part of the Coyote Commission Project.
<br />
<br />
John mentioned in introducing the event that what we were to hear/see was still unformed in its structure (there were a couple of scenes, in fact, that he simply had the actors read at the end, still not knowing where they should go, or if he’d even keep them), and indeterminate of tone (did he want this to be a romantic comedy, something more serious, or a combo of both? John didn’t yet know…). His introduction made clear that the script was not yet at a stage to be judged or critiqued.
<br />
<br />
Nonetheless, as one of the producers of the CCP, I took John up on his request for feedback, hoping that my impressions and comments would help him clarify where he wanted to go with CLEAR HISTORY. I saw it as my-end-of-the-deal to let him know what I thought.
<br />
<br />
So I wrote him an email, insisting that he discard, out-of-hand and immediately, any of my comments that seemed to miss the mark or that he disagreed with. Then I told him what I thought worked and what didn’t. I pointed to where the story surprised me, where I thought it would go, where I thought it SHOULD go.
<br />
He emailed a response the next day — prompt and appreciative — addressing my comments and offering his own about what the reading had revealed. He thanked me for my thoughts and assured me that they had helped to clarify for him several aspects of CLEAR HISTORY.
<br />
<br />
But…for all the warmth and respect of our exchange, it felt, in my gut, somehow inappropriate for me to have evaluated his still-forming work. It occurs to me that he may feel, and rightly so, the same way I feel when someone comments on my work when it is cooking — outwardly appreciative of someone’s well-intended comments, and inwardly peeved.
<br />
<br />
Of course I fail the artist when I reflect back to him or her information that is unhelpful—my personal taste. My job, instead, is to honestly reflect back to them whether or not what I have seen is what they want me to see—not to suggest a different direction in the plot, say, or a different setting, or different characteristics in the characters I’ve witnessed. In this, I now understand, I misapprehended my role in my notes to John.
<br />
<br />
If criticism is meant to speak to the successful clarity of what was INTENDED, as Mr. Adamo suggests, what is the helpful way to speak of a work in process that is still brewing, still deciding what it is supposed to be?
<br />
<br />
Given that public readings for works-in-progress seem destined to remain a part of the playwright’s process these days, I would love for the CCP participants, and any other playwrights out there, to comment on the lessons I took away from these two experiences as audience member / feedback giver. What kinds of observations are helpful to you, and what kinds of observations serve only to derail you and infuriate?<br />
<br />
- Stephen Speights
Stephen Speightshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03128438259351463570noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-5799051923478912752012-02-06T13:39:00.001-05:002012-02-08T13:18:16.313-05:00The Soul Hungers for Beauty<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> I</span></b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> have a friend. It doesn’t matter what her name is. Let’s call her “Erma Duricko.”</span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Erma likes quotes. Lots and lots of quotes. She has quotes tagging the end of her emails. She posts them every day on Facebook. These quotes are usually of an inspirational nature. They are usually on the subject of how beauty and art and love conquer all.</span></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">I roll my eyes a lot around Erma. She encourages it. Truth be told, she loves it. We were at a conference together once when a student came up to tell me how Erma had encouraged her to look into her past lives to help her write her new play. I was about to explode in total exasperation when I looked up to see Erma hiding behind a potted plant, laughing her head off. She had set me up.</span><br />
<b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></b>
<b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">I </b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">was in a place. It doesn’t matter what place it was. Let’s call it “Montgomery, Alabama.”</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.5in;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; text-indent: 0.5in;">I have it on good authority from a friend that there are lovely nooks and crannies to Montgomery. She spoke of eccentric farmer’s markets and creative yoga studios. I have no doubt that she told the truth. It was not, however, a truth that did much for a man charged with entertaining a 3 year old.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">My experience of the town of Montgomery was different than my friend’s. I found the place to be horrendous, an endless flat expanse of concrete and chain stores and malls. Arid and soulless on a good day, it had been ravaged by the recession. Driving past the endless run of closed down strip malls, it was all I could do not to stick a gun in my mouth.</span><br />
<b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></b>
<b style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">One</b><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> night, with my son was asleep in the next room, I watched a movie. It was Steve McQueen’s </span><i style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Hunger, </i><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">a 2008 film about the Irish hunger strikers. Netflix had sent it to me a while ago. I’d heard wonderful things about it, but the subject matter put me off. How many evenings do you do you say to yourself, “I’d like to watch someone starve themselves to death tonight”?</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">That night, I watched it. It was as bad as I feared. Worse. You see the deterioration of the body in horrifying detail: the festering sores, the incontinence, the mind slowly slipping off the rails. What happens to a body when it is denied food is that it essentially eats itself.</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">It is an awful thing to witness.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">The genius of </span><i style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Hunger</i><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">, however, is that it is also beautiful. McQueen was a well-known visual artist before turning to film, and his mastery shows in every frame. However bleak the scene, he always frames and shoots it so that you can’t look away. Images from the film</span> <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">–</span> <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">a pair of bruised, bloody hands being washed in a basin, a shaken man smoking a cigarette alone in a snowstorm, the red sores of shoulder blades beginning to stick through skin in an otherwise pristine white room – are lodged in my mind. They may well be there for as long as I have a mind.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">One image in particular stuck out. There is a visual theme in the film linking the first hunger striker, Bobby Sands, with some birds nestled in a tree. When Sands finally dies, the birds fly away all at once. They are black against a deep purple sky. They squawk and rustle and fly away into silence. The moment was so staggeringly beautiful I audibly gasped.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">After I did, a thought appeared in my mind – “The soul hungers for beauty.” I say that because I think I gasped not just from the force of the image. I gasped because I was starving. After two weeks in Montgomery, I was desperate for beauty. I felt so grateful for it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Now, I’m not the kind of person who says things like, “The soul hungers for beauty.” Reflecting on it now, it sounds stupid. A romantic, childlike fantasy. Christ, it sounds like something Erma would say.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">But here’s the thing about me and Erma - we’re collaborators, and damn good ones. I’m a playwright. She’s a director. She’s as good as anyone I’ve ever worked with (and I’ve worked with some good ones).</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">Perhaps our sensibilities aren’t so different after all. Maybe we’re not as far apart as the roles we play to the world would indicate. Perhaps inside herself Erma’s rolls her eyes all the time. Maybe inside I long for love and beauty and hope. We are a fine yin-and-yang, as all collaborators should be.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">So in her honor, with no eye roll, I say it:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">The soul hungers for beauty.</span></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><br />- John Yearley</span></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> </span></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> </span></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"> </span></div>Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-29284633696350912542012-01-31T13:42:00.001-05:002012-01-31T13:42:53.846-05:00DeadlinesAs I write this I am staring at a list that represents deadlines for five writing projects, six teaching projects, two reading projects, and the very forgettable exercise project that is not getting off the ground this month.<br />
<br />
January is ending and very few of these projects have been completed. Instead they grow, evolve, multiply, go into another draft, ask for more, need more, want more, demand more. <br />
<br />
Several years ago I decided I would approach my work in projects instead of jobs. So, in my teaching artist work I began to take on projects instead of classes and with writing I allowed each play to be its own project with its own workshop of sound, notebook, images and timeline. <br />
<br />
I like this approach. I am more organized. My natural bent towards eclecticism and desire for letting things evolve organically is given the container of a project. I can schedule work so that even when there's not a lot of time for one thing, I can check in on it. Visit it. <br />
<br />
I can imagine my desk is like my dad's workbench, tools and hardware at hand, shelves of power tools and raw materials. Imagine that hung up along the wall are images, in the little drawers lie characters dreaming away, in one area are a bunch of teaching ideas, and the power tools are actions, are big questions, are those books I carry with me through every move.<br />
<br />
But. <br />
<br />
Now my workshop is looking like some shed from one of the families down the other street, where things accumulate but nothing is ever finished. It's looking like the yard with cars up on blocks and a fridge on the porch. A dog running back and forth till there's a patch of dirt that nothing will grow on ever again. There's half a pool dug, some kind of tree house that no kid would even want to play in and a flag pole leaning against the chimney. There are too many kittens and they are sleeping in a cracked aquarium.<br />
<br />
So. It's time to clean up. Time to clear out. Time to call some things done and other things well - maybe the neighbors want them.<br /><br />- Kristen PalmerKristen Palmerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07614560879130581868noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-26918690678102475132012-01-25T13:32:00.000-05:002012-01-25T13:32:26.319-05:00WHEN TO SAY WHEN...<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxEKGl4zkGFjTgZM7jn265v8CYXgTSsM3uc8Oq2YxQeUGRlprF3RT562AqajIZNe2eoIXcb32N7bocQDBqRcVCKuojM4uWoXY7-EzKgeMPuTCBmHmoNs4-lFHmknKNnYwdAmhIwXKBGkk/s1600/eating.jpg" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5700575068750207346" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjxEKGl4zkGFjTgZM7jn265v8CYXgTSsM3uc8Oq2YxQeUGRlprF3RT562AqajIZNe2eoIXcb32N7bocQDBqRcVCKuojM4uWoXY7-EzKgeMPuTCBmHmoNs4-lFHmknKNnYwdAmhIwXKBGkk/s200/eating.jpg" style="display: block; height: 132px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: 0px; text-align: center; width: 200px;" /></a><br />
First, let me make one thing clear. What I’m about to say in no way applies to me. Everything I’ve ever written (this post included) is gold. Pure gold. I’ve never wasted a single word and, because of that, am actually dictating this post to my assistant while lounging in my penthouse’s hot tub half-crocked on Veuve…<br />
<br />
But (and this is for everyone else, mind you … not me), I’ve been wondering at what point writers know to let a project go. We all (…I mean, you all) have the drawer or the binder or … um, the seldom-emptied waste basket filled with the papers covered with the words we used to love, only no longer do. We all (…okay, only for the sake of ease here, when I say “we” from now on, it’ll seem like I mean “we,” but actually I mean “you” - “we” means “you,” go it?) have the play that we couldn’t figure out – the one that has had several readings, but just never made it over the hump and really grabbed the right people’s attention – the one that we’ve revised and re-written and reconceived and regurgitated but we never got it to “<span style="font-style: italic;">Wow</span>.”<br />
<br />
“<span style="font-style: italic;">Wow</span>,” of course, is what gets people who aren’t you behind a particular piece of writing. We all know “<span style="font-style: italic;">Wow</span>.” It’s what we feel. It’s why we bother. But, for something to have a life beyond ourselves, someone else (usually several people and usually the right several people) need to get “<span style="font-style: italic;">Wow</span>” too. And some of us grind and grind away on the same script (because it did take a good deal of time, thought and concern … and we’re not exactly dripping with leisure time, are we? Since [what we often view as] the bulk of the work is done … this draft is done … this second, third or seventeenth revision of this draft is done … we might as well stick with it, right?). And some of us drop it and immediately pick up <span style="font-style: italic;">Shiny New Idea</span> and get to work on that.<br />
<br />
But what is that thought when the switch flips from “project in-process” to “yeah, not gonna be working on that again”? Is it a realization of some fundamental flaw in the piece (i.e. is it a learning moment?)? Is it a feeling of resignation that the piece has made it’s rounds without anything significant happening to it (i.e. the recognition that people don’t want to keep seeing your same piece over and over again)? Is it boredom (i.e. “I can’t think about these characters anymore!”)?<br />
<br />
Of course, it’s these things – and many other things. There is no good conqueror who doesn’t leave a trail of dead bodies in his/her wake (… okay, no good conqueror <span style="font-style: italic;">that I know of</span>).<br />
<br />
I guess, for me (which means “me”), I keep projects going so long as there is interest – or some spark that still keeps the process fresh and alive for me. I have no interest in riding the same script through the development process for years and years. There is a point (again, for me) where the script feels dead – where I’ve killed it with my work on it. And, maybe it will live again one fine day. But, for that time, the best thing to do is cut the cord.<br />
<br />
- Robert AttenweilerRobert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-63891663688178316912012-01-20T17:12:00.000-05:002012-01-20T17:12:11.973-05:00We Are All Udmurts!<div class="MsoNormal">
Lately I’ve been trying to imagine the life of a woman I’ve made up, from a place <i>didn’t</i> make up (…though sounds like I did).</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The woman’s name is Mrs Huff, and she rents a room out in Queens. She is old, frightened, but has powers her new lodger - whom she is immediately convinced is a thief - isn’t quick to realize...</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
The place she’s from is Udmurtia – a semi-autonomous ethnic republic on the edge of European Russia. The Udmurts are a Finno-Ugric people related to other small groups of Finno-Ugric people near them …and also to a some larger populations to the West - the Finns, of course, the Estonians, and also the Hungarians – who maybe 1100 years ago were the Udmurts’ next door neighbors, until they took their horses and rode west.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I first learned about Udmurtia in a funny, excellent travelogue by self described anti-tourist Daniel Kalder called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Cosmonaut-Observations-Daniel-Kalder/dp/0743289943/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1327000667&sr=8-1" target="_blank">“Lost Cosmonaut”</a><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt;"> </span>and I was immediately hooked. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Who were these crazy people?? I don’t know why they fascinated me so much, or what exactly I’m chasing writing about one now.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
…Perhaps it’s something about the comic melancholy of coming from a people who almost none of us in America have ever heard of, or hear from. A people Russia has done an excellent job of nearly (culturally) destroying. What it might feel like to come from such a proud culture that is not only disappearing…. but whose name itself sounds ludicrous to our ears? who speak a language no one could study in college even if they wanted to?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Maybe it’s the only recently discarded pagan heritage (their closely-related neighbors, the Mari El, never converted to Christianity, and so are considered Europe’s last fully pagan culture). Maybe it’s that Tchaikovsky is from Udmurtia (though ethnically Ukrainian) or that Kalashnikov – born in 1919! still alive! inventor of world most popular gun! – lives there now and there is a museum in the capital celebrating him. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Or maybe it’s: we who write in English have a notion that we have the potential to write for a huge audience, if we are lucky, millions. (100s of millions if we write a hit movie... or "The Phantom of the Opera".) We think “if my play is published, in a hundred years, in 500 years, people may still read it!” </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
What would it be to write a play in Udmurt? What courage. What humility. For what you write will most probably evaporate. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
And yet we, the children of victorious linguistic groups, will evaporate too. Most all our work will fade away. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
And someday, maybe in 500 or 1000 years, even our language may change past recognition. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
So perhaps: We are all Udmurts. Or will be. <br /><br />- David Zellnik</div>David Zellnikhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01846940762193857903noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-63297111305552331112012-01-18T17:35:00.000-05:002012-01-18T17:35:04.933-05:00A Boy Who Really, Really Liked His Horse<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
So…<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse.</i></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> </i></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
It’s a juggernaut. It won six Oliviers. It won five Tonys. It won Best Play on both sides of the pond. It has been made into a giganto new movie by Steven Spielberg that was nominated for two Golden Globes. It didn’t win any, but hey, you can’t have everything.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b><i>“Jooooooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!”</i></b></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Those who have seen <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse</i> know the origin of that plaintive cry, which is tattooed on my brain for what I can only presume to be the rest of my life. It is the most oft-repeated line in <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse</i>, and more or less describes the entire action of the play.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
In little more detail, the story is as follows:</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Joey is a horse. He is thought to be wild, damaged, unfit for work or the company of humans. Albert is a boy. Albert tames Joey through boundless attention and selfless love. All seems happy and well until Albert’s drunken father loses Joey in a bet, and Joey gets sent off to help the troops in World War I. Albert enlists so he can go rescue his beloved horse on the Western front. I’ll let you guess whether or not he succeeds.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Here’s what <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse </i>is – visually dazzling, continually inventive, a magnificent succession of images.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Here’s what <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse </i>isn’t – a good play.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
There’s no question that <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse</i> is extraordinary to look at. It is filled with the kind of moments that evoke a childlike sense of awe and wonder. But is there no one else who walked out after three endless hours of a boy wailing about his horse and thought the whole thing was kind of, maybe, just a little bit…stupid? </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
I will be accused of being callous, but as anyone who knows me will attest to, I’m a sap. I cry all the time, and it doesn’t have to be great art that calls forth those tears (cell phone commercials will often do it). And I was with <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse </i>for a while. The beauty of the images made me happy, almost tingly. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
As the evening stretched on (and ON), however, my interest began to seriously flag.* I started to have questions of the mental well-being of our young Albert, whose single minded determination began to seem less like boundless, childlike love than an autistic fixation. More to the point, as an audience member I started to feel manipulated. Jerked around.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
I turned on <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse</i> for good after a scene when Albert and his friend have been cut off from their unit. They are walking through that World War I patch of hell known as No Man’s Land when Albert’s friend basically gets his head blown off. Albert is discomfited by this for a moment, then brushes himself off and returns to looking for his horse.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"> </b></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><br /></b></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">(?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?)</b></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
I confess I have an issue with people placing what I consider an inappropriate amount of emotion onto animals, so perhaps I’m more sensitive to this than most. But wasn’t anyone else disquieted by the Albert’s casual shrugging off his friend’s violent death? Was there no one who thought that maybe the friend’s death would be an event of an equal (or even – GOD FORBID – greater) import than the fate of that horse?</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
This thought brought others in its wake. I started to wonder at the propriety of using the historical event of World War I to tell this story. The Great War, as it was called then, was one of the great cataclysms of world history. Millions upon millions of people died in a conflict whose origins were murky and results almost non-existent. It was epic slaughter for absolutely no reason. I find it a little off-putting that against the backdrop of this ocean of blood, where an entire generation of men died, the thing I’m supposed to be concerned about is the fate of a single horse. What’s next? A heartwarming tale of a girl’s love for her cat against the backdrop of the Holocaust? </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
I have no bone to pick with anyone who liked <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse</i> (a group that includes just about everyone I know). I get it. It’s beautiful. It’s an experience. But I cannot join the hosannas. For all its grandeur, for all its success, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War Horse </i>traffics in a kind of smug, ahistorical sentimentalism that makes me a little nauseous. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
- John Yearley</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<i>*My wife says that everything she loves about me is encapsulated by the moment in Act III when I turned to her and muttered, “Boy, that kid REALLY likes that horse.”</i>
</div>Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-31517458640688459042012-01-13T13:51:00.002-05:002012-01-13T13:51:47.191-05:00Happy New Year and Good News!Hello Internet! <br /><br />We hope you all had happy holidays -- however many you enjoyed -- and have already embarked on a Happy New Year! (If you got left behind, we wish you the best of luck.)<br /><br />We're all back to work on upcoming projects, but we wanted to take a minute to crow about the Dramatist's Guild grant we recently received in support of our "efforts to promote the work and wellbeing of writers for the theater." Chief among those are our Coyote Commission Project and the upcoming production of David Johnston's <i>Coney. </i><br />
<i><br /></i><br />
We just got the news -- what a great way to start 2012!<i> </i>That's all! Now back to your regularly scheduled blog...<br /><br />All the best,<br />Bob, Kyle, Gary, and StephenKyle Ancowitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03434218117646333666noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-53602144209545826722011-12-29T10:00:00.000-05:002011-12-29T10:00:01.771-05:00My First TimeA blog. Never before have I written a blog or on a blog or for a blog or whatever you say when you are talking about blogging….I have never blogged? Does that work? Okay, I have never blogged. This is my first blog. Today is the day I blog for the first time. I feel different, I must admit. I think I am radiating blogger vibes and it feels sexy…and sad. Sound familiar? Yeah, not to me either but I am sure someone out there has had an experience where those emotions co-exist (j.k., sexy/sad is my home address).<br />
<br />
When I think of writing I immediately conjure up images of Hemingway at a typewriter in Key West with an open window, a ceiling fan rippling his already beaten up slips of paper. Or of Woolf, sequestered in her study, having trays of food brought to her door because she could not bear to break with words. A tea set is present, as is a wild bird in a cage hanging from the ceiling. And of course I think of Williams typing furiously, half-drunk in golden light with a lover sleeping in the bed next to his desk. Writers toiling, struggling privately; cocooned inside of their own imaginations for months and years until the completed (?) draft was ready to share. It took time. It took tears. It took drinks. It was where they lived. In short: I romanticize the act of writing like a motherfucker.<br />
<br />
I don’t fashion my life to look like the inside of a precious snow globe, but I do like a bit of silk to be thrown over the lampshade: I don’t take the content of my writing or myself too seriously but there is something too quick, too easy, about a blog. It makes me uncomfortable.<br />
<br />
But maybe it doesn’t. I’m sort of having a blast writing this (from my desk that is in a basement of a Tribeca bar. No wild bird. No ceiling fan. No lover. But I do have Diet Dr. Pepper, Swedish Fish, and Pandora is playing a solid playlist from my En Vogue station). Yeah, this is nice. When I think of people reading this and all of the inevitable grammatical errors, I’m sure I will get hot all over and my butt cheeks will clinch together really tightly. But that pretty much happens any time I share my work; whether it is a close friend reading a script for the first time, a fully rehearsed production in front of an audience on closing night, or during my rendition of Fancy by Reba McIntyre during Karaoke. So, it is no different, really. Sharing is sharing.<br />
<br />
Okay, thanks everybody. I like blogging. I think I will do it again. Romanticizing things might work for a minute, but ultimately it is just another way to keep yourself right where you are. And baby: it’s time to move.<br />
<br />
- Boo KillebrewBoo Killebrewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00379292524308802357noreply@blogger.com013-31 Worth St, Manhattan, NY 10013, USA40.7178704 -74.007978140.705835400000005 -74.0277191 40.7299054 -73.9882371tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-83035705083159176042011-12-26T22:50:00.001-05:002012-01-22T16:45:21.497-05:00Man At WorkTake this with a grain of salt, if you'd like, because I am officially writing this post on my phone while working a busy pre-holiday shift at my East Village bar. So, raise a glass to multi-tasking and put a holly's worth of hope on my spell-checker and let's rattle off a few, quick holiday writing observations...<br /><br />1.) People still go to the theater. Shocking, I know. But I just talked to a law student tonight who had seen BY FAR more theater than me in the last year. He saw everything I should have seen (but, in many ways, couldn't because I WORK NIGHTS). And he was raving about "Jerusalem." I want to be raving about "Jerusalem," but here we are...<br /><br />2.) December is my official LEAST favorite time to get writing done. With gift buying, travel and a busier service industry (that behooves me to work as much as possible) I've relegated month 12 to a time to get things done that can be done in 45 minute increments (because that's all I seem to have...).<br /><br />(Oh, I'm sorry. I just had to address the "Are all men assholes?" question while her oblivious friends - none, I think, the assholes in question - sang the "Gummy Bears" cartoon theme - loudly and with great relish. These are the days of our dreams, my people!)<br /><br />3.) But it is a good time to keep conversations going. While it's been difficult to get substantive work done, I have had a good time the last six weeks talking to a potential writing partner about a potential project. We've been talking in fits and starts- which is exactly what my schedule allows now. So, keep the lines open...<br /><br />4.) I get to talk to tourists. For better or worse, I get the pulse of the theater-going nation. They generally like what you'd expect them to like.<br /><br />5.) The depressing reality of fundraising this time of year. Everyone's got their end-of-year pitches. Do any of them work? <br /><br />6.) Don't write every day. It's great if you can, but follow your life.<br /><br />- Robert AttenweilerRobert Attenweilerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13864225974680082822noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-57974676700450470412011-12-22T21:22:00.001-05:002011-12-23T16:03:03.614-05:00Young Loves<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-fnUXJxVUbwBosQZrdticFryzbbl83Tf_-W0NzTozSwwWxr1r72QchXM6LVPUF2nW2EGn3Tys2ycJRHr3_1uDZF8XE6ldttCdEa94g06mg2ORntmqPMQUl5ILwJo8QaPYIhUyhGiKt9c/s1600/cooperandaudrey.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-fnUXJxVUbwBosQZrdticFryzbbl83Tf_-W0NzTozSwwWxr1r72QchXM6LVPUF2nW2EGn3Tys2ycJRHr3_1uDZF8XE6ldttCdEa94g06mg2ORntmqPMQUl5ILwJo8QaPYIhUyhGiKt9c/s320/cooperandaudrey.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
I've been looking back at early influences. Things I encountered in those years when the synapses are on overload, when sleep is un-necessary, when a trip to the Fas-Mart is an adventure (that might be another post)<br />
<br />
Anyways. This has led me to re-read Orpheus Descending and re-view Twin Peaks. These are two works of art that I love. and still love, but what I didn't know is how much I steal from them. In so many permutations. An image here, a name here, a moment of tension there, a turn of phrase - and how there are things from these works that I turn over and over in my unconscious, maybe these things were turning over before I saw them, and then, like an unstable molecule they attached and grew and grew until they became structures and works on their own.<br />
<br />
Do you have these early loves? What are they? How do they sneak into your work? What are the things you cannot forget?<br />
<br />
- Kristen PalmerKristen Palmerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07614560879130581868noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2054815629493073411.post-32616923799387894002011-12-19T15:43:00.000-05:002011-12-20T09:24:23.188-05:00In Praise of Francis Ford CoppolaThe ways in which this country is fucked up are too manifold to go in to in this humble little blog. But I would like to take up, for a moment, the issue of this country’s relationship to art and artists. <br />
<br />
“Uh oh,” you’re thinking. “Another plaintive whine from an artist who feels he’s unappreciated. THIS is gonna be fun to read!”
Fear not. Though a life in the arts is difficult, it is also a choice. No one put a gun to my head to make me a playwright. When I decided to do this, I more or less (well, actually less – but that’s another story) knew what I was in for.
I don’t want to talk not about myself here. I want to talk about Francis Ford Coppola.
<br />
<br />
My level of accomplishment is open to debate. Francis Ford Coppola’s is not. <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Godfather</i> is, to my mind, the greatest American film. It is one of those select few works of art that has permeated our entire culture. Our understanding of ourselves as Americans, of our history, is profoundly influenced by that film. <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Godfather </i>also performs that rarest of feats –<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"> </i>great art that is also greatly popular. For several years, in fact, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Godfather </i>was not just our greatest film. It was also our most popular. This is a staggering accomplishment.<br />
<br />
If Coppola did nothing else in his entire career, he would worthy of the highest possible praise.
Instead, he was just getting started. In the six years following <i>The Godfather</i>, Coppola wrote and directed <i>The Godfather Part II </i>(thought by many to be even better than the original),<i> The Conversation, </i>and <i>Apocalypse Now. </i>All 4 of those films were on the American Film Institute top 100 films. And he did it in a single decade, the 1970s.<br />
<br />
(A fun parlor game – name an artist in any art, at any time, who had a greater decade than Coppola in the 1970s. Dickens in the 1850s? Picasso in the 1920s? Shakespeare in 1600-1610?)<br />
<br />
Recently I heard Coppola interviewed. In this interview he was asked the same embarrassing questions he always is - about how he lost his money, how his studio went bankrupt, how many less-than-great films he’s made. People seem to put this air of unfulfilled promise on him, like he’s some sort of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">enfant terrible</i> who never quite panned out.
<br />
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br />
If Coppola is a failure, God help the rest of us.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Why do people continue to harp on every unseemly detail of Coppola’s career? He is a giant. The world is full of people who lost their money, or who have made bad films. Only one person has made <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Apocalypse Now. </i>Which of these facts is more salient, more relevant, more interesting?</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Francis Ford Coppola is one of the greatest artists this country has ever produced. He could make shitty movies for the rest of his life and it would not change that fact. He could foolishly squander his money a thousand times and it would not affect change that fact. A culture that believed in art, that was grateful for all the beauty that great art can bring into our lives, would understand that.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
Some cultures revere artists. There was a national day of mourning when Victor Hugo died. Tolstoy was considered the second most powerful person in Russia after the Czar.</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
There should be statues of Coppola in public squares. There never will be. </div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
It is our loss.<br />
<br /></div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
- John Yearley</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">
</div>Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04560636510931968859noreply@blogger.com0