I just wrapped up a draft of a television pilot script I’ve
been developing (read: “in own mind”) for the last few months. Without giving
too much away, it takes place in the mid-1970s and deals with professional sports.
Great soil for a show: drugs, race, money… great drama. Only one problem: no
women.
The way the story developed – and it developed as a strong,
multi-character ensemble – I became keenly aware that one of the drawbacks of
trying to be authentic in portraying a boy’s world in what was more of a boy’s
era than today is the difficulty of finding a place for strong female
characters, especially in a pilot where so much focus is just setting up the
world – where so much could be developed down the line in that world.
Now, let’s be clear. I have no interest in creating a show
driven entirely by male characters. But, in portraying a world that – at least
at first gloss – is driven entirely by male characters, I still want the world
I create to be authentic. There were plenty of female characters in the first
draft of this pilot and I could see many of them developing into strong characters. The problem is that, in a
pilot, the suggestion of development has to be there, sure, but there also has
to be something already there (since a pilot is generally only ever going to be
just a pilot, not a series).
Take Mad Men and its
pilot. It also takes place in a different era, in a more male-centric arena,
but it’s been able to introduce many fantastic, strong female roles. But what
do we get in the pilot? We don’t get Betty yet. We don’t see Don’s home life
until the very last scene. We get Joan and Peggy, so there is the hint that
they will show us this world from a female perspective – from the savvy, sexy
veteran of the gender game and the shy, homlier newbie. Structurally, these
characters serve the pilot extremely well, but I’m putting a lot of weight back
onto those characters, I think, because of how they end up developing and
serving the show. I don’t know if there’s anything beyond a suggestion of that
in the pilot and I might only be reading that suggestion in because I know how
that it pans out. I think, if the pilot were a one-off, they could easily be
seen in the “women in traditional roles” characters, secretaries in a
male-driven world.
Ugh…
But here’s where Matthew Weiner made a very smart play.
Along with the cigarette account storyline (men dealing with men), he
introduces Rachel Menken, the daughter of a long-time department store owner,
who wants Sterling-Cooper to modernize their image. She’s an immediate foil and
love/sex interest for Don Draper and she seems perfectly authentic –
progressive, but believable for 1960. She’s smart enough to not immediately
succumb to Don Draper, which frustrates our protagonist, and becomes the
resonant suggestion that this show will find room for strong female characters.
So, I looked back at my story. It works (I think). It works
fine the way it is. But if I want to portray a world that’s representative of
the depth of complexity that is the core of every person, then I’m going to
have to tweak my representation of this world. The strongest choice that didn’t
involve blowing up the script and redeveloping it with this in mind (which,
most likely, would not lead to the greatest end product) was to change the
owner of the sports team from a man to a woman. This forced a lot of things in
a lot of scenes to change, but it also worked in the same way that Rachel
Menken worked in the Mad Men pilot.
Marge Schott bought a minority ownership stake in the Cincinnati Reds in 1981,
not so far away from the mid-70s of this story. It would be a little
progressive for this era, but not so much that it would create a big
believability disconnect. In fact, it would likely produce more interesting
relationships than keeping the owner a man.
Now, I’m not breaking any big news by announcing that there
are places for strong female roles in traditionally male-centric worlds – and
I’m not trying to. But sometimes the tension (or even the perceived tension)
between authenticity and painting using the whole human pallet can be a
challenge. This was just my way in on this one particular project. And there
are plenty of other ways in. There
are just... ways in.
With a full human pallet, I will proceed to paint some happy
little trees.
- Robert Attenweiler
- Robert Attenweiler